Tuesday, September 24, 2013

The Syrian Battle

In Syria, the battle is fundamentally the Sunni vs Shia. The Assad regime is Alawite/Shia/ Ba'athist, and is a 10-15% minority in Syria. Alawites live in and around Syria, including Turkey and Lebanon.The Assad family came to power in the 70's, by overthrowing the repressive government of the Sunni’s.
 There should be no confusion as to why Iran backs the Assad regime, or why Russia does. The Sunni regime basically, represent the agenda of the colonial powers of France, Britain, America and other "Western" powers – to ours and their detriment.

The U.S. has been caught in the middle ground, of either backing their allies that simply want to control the resources of Syria, or furthering old colonial policies originated by the French and British, against the Shia of Iran and by proxy, Russia.
Again, the Assad regime is, Alawite. So who are the “moderates” in Syria, and who are they attempting to overthrow? The Shiites and the Alawites of course, who by the way, came to power as, “freedom fighters.”
The Sunni seem easier to control, I guess is the thinking by the world-domination elite. However, to clarify something, the Sunni's generally want a strict Islamic state, how the colonial powers think they can control that is beyond me, maybe through bribery; who knows?

I find it ironic that since this “diplomatic overture” to take control of and (someday - right) dispose of the chemical weapon stockpile of the Syrian regime, we don’t hear a peep in the mainstream media lately about the "EVIDENCE." Why is that? They have continued their worship of Obama, helped him save face, and they do not want the truth to come out about who actually used those chemical weapons.

I wrote elsewhere that I believed the evidence was there that the Syrian regime was the guilty party. But now, as I see this little game unfold, I think the objective was carried out; blame the Assad regime, embolden the various factions, including the Muslim Brudderhood, to oust the Alawite/Ba'athist/Shi party, out of Syria, and replace it, once again with the repressive and possibly amenable regime of Sunni control.

But Who are the 100,000 dead? Who were the 1400 dead? Was the majority of the 100,000 killed, Shia/Alawite? Not - as far as I can tell, to date. Was the 1400 killed by chemical weapons, also supporters of the Assad regime, and died as a result of a conspiracy, cooked up by the “colonial powers,” to kill supporters; innocents, for the sole purpose of propaganda against the Assad regime? Most likely.
 Others have pointed out that this particular attack, which brought the anger of the world, including my own, is a farce. This is not a humanitarian cause in itself. IMO This was a meticulously planned out conspiracy for the above mentioned objective. I disagree wholeheartedly that “their problem isn’t our problem…” but I can clearly see that the rat-face politics and agendas, perpetuated by this administration, his “handlers,” and in complicity with the other colonial, resource-controlling world, is not at all what we as Americans should support.
I think we could kill two birds with one stone here; get rid of the chemical weapons, find out the absolute truth about who used them, by demanding a vigorous, authentic, and independent investigation, as to how, when, why, and who, used these chemical weapons, and get rid of the powers that are behind all of this.

If this could ever be accomplished, I’d bet my house that the results would show that this was a planned coup. This diplomatic overture has only deferred the outcome. They want Assad gone because they can’t control the Alawytes or the Shia’s.